Monthly Archives: August 2020

Adieu Good Men

 

When new movie releases are dominated by re-makes or re-boots, it is a clear signal writers and producers are short on new material.  This year has been no exception. From Hugh Jackman as Dr. Doolittle to Colin Firth as Mary’s guardian Archibald Craven in The Secret Garden to Elizabeth Moss fighting off The Invisible Man, I have found they have one thing in common.  Making me wish I might find the originals available for viewing on Turner Classic Movies or The Criterion Channel.

Open Letter to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) – Around the BlockHowever, there is one re-boot I anxiously await.  Aaron Sorkin and Rob Reiner’s courtroom drama pitting a young Navy lawyer Daniel Kaffee (Tom Cruise) against Colonel Nathan Jessep (Jack Nicholson).  Sorkin and Reiner have promised to retain much of the pithy dialogue from A Few Good Men, especially in the final confrontation between the two adversaries.  Except in the new rendition the actors use their real names.  California congressman Adam Schiff has been cast as the prosecutor and Florida Senator Marco Rubio as the defendant who believes he is entitled to his own reality.

There is one other major deviation from the original.  The trial is not precipitated by the murder of PFC Willie Santiago by fellow marines for allegedly violating the corps’ code of honor.  In this latest adaptation, defendant Rubio is accused of being complicit in one final, desperate effort to cover up the Trump campaign’s coordination with Russian officials to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Spoiler Alert:  This morning I had a chance to screen excerpts from the film and feel it is my responsibility to share with you the conclusion of the final showdown between the two rivals.

Schiff:  Senator Rubio, if you thought the Russian investigation was a hoax why did you and other members of the committee like Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton and Texas Senator John Cornyn sign off on the Senate Intelligence report that confirmed everything in the Mueller report and more.  The three of you have been among the most vocal critics of the Mueller report and the impeachment of Donald Trump.

Rubio:  Because if there had been Russian collusion, the country would have been in danger.

Schiff:  Grave danger?

Rubio:  Is there another kind?

Schiff:  Senator, if, in writing (holds up the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report), you were willing to confirm the existence of coordination between the Russians and the Trump campaign and allege Donald Trump committed perjury by lying in his written testimony to the special counsel, why would you immediately tweet “WE found no evidence of collusion” ?

Rubio:  You want answers?

Schiff:  I think I’m entitled to them.

Rubio:  You want answers?!

Schiff:  I want the truth.

Rubio:  Neither you or Trump supporters can handle the truth…  Son, we live in a world with walls and Bibles that are props so Trump can pretend that he is protecting you from imaginary enemies.  And people like me have to guard those myths.  I have more responsibility to protect Donald Trump’s image than you can fathom.  You weep for America and curse Trump.  You don’t know what I know.  And my existence, while grotesque to you, ensures Trump and Mitch McConnell stay in power despite the fact that the Republican party has lost the popular vote in six of the last seven presidential elections and Democratic candidates for the Senate in 2018 received 12 million more votes than their GOP opponents.  We use words like hoax, fake news, rigged elections and enemy of the people.  They’re the backbone of our power.  I have neither the time or inclination to explain myself or Donald Trump to someone who questions the way we do things.  Better just to thank us.

Schiff:  Senator, did you and are you still covering up for Donald Trump?

Rubio:  I did the job he sent me to do.

Schiff:  Did you cover up for the president?

Rubio:  You’re goddamn right I did.

Schiff:  Your honor, I suggest the jury be dismissed so that we can move to an immediate Article 39a Session.  The witness has rights.

Rubio:  What the hell’s going on?  I did my job.  I’d do it again.  Now I’m getting on a plane and going back to Florida.

Judge: Sergeant-at-arms, please take the Senator into custody.

In case you’re wondering, Senator Rubio’s trial is scheduled for November, 2022 during which a jury of his constituents will have a chance to render judgment.  As he did during his 2016 run for the White House, Rubio will no doubt look to divine providence for guidance in waging his defense.  Matt Damon has already secured the movie rights and hired Paul Greengrass to direct.  The working title?  You guessed it.  The Bourne-Again Ultimatum.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Receipt, Please

 

Final Jeopardy Answer:

Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas

Final Jeopardy Question:

In which states were all or some ballots cast through direct recording electronic systems (DRE) without a paper backup in 2018?

This morning Mika Brzezinski told viewers she would never step foot on 5th Avenue in New York City.  Why?  Because Donald Trump has said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it.  In her words, “And I believe him!”  Her evidence?  During the past three and a half years he has telegraphed every attempt to corrupt the system or break down norms of behavior.  He told us he was going to seek illegal campaign assistance from foreign powers.  He said he would separate babies and young children from their mothers at the Mexican border.  And just yesterday he admitted he opposes emergency funding for the U.S. Postal Service so it cannot be relied on to process and deliver mail-in ballots in a timely fashion this November.

No surprise.  In March Trump told Fox News, increased funding for vote-by-mail would result in “levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”  Trump, better than anyone, understands a fact of political life in America.  When Democrats vote, Democrats win.  The logical response?  Suppress the vote.  Make it hard for Democrats to safely vote in person, and make them skeptical their mail-in ballot will be counted.

If you believe this is the beginning and end of this story, you will again be underestimating Donald Trump.  When it comes to this master of misdirection, you have to ask, “If he’s making such a fuss about the timing of mail-in ballots, dragging out the election for days, weeks or even months, what doesn’t he want us to see?”  An answer that no one in the media is talking about.

This week, FiveThirtyEight released its first forecast of the 2020 presidential election.  Without boring you with the methodology, it is based on the following process.  Nate Silver and his team simulate the election 40,000 times, each with a difference variation of distribution of electoral votes.  So when they predict Biden now has a 72 percent chance of becoming the next commander-in-chief, it simply means there are still 28 percent of possible scenarios where Trump carries enough states to garner the necessary 270 electoral votes  for re-election.  And in almost every one of those story lines, the following four states are critical:  Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Texas.  Trump must carry those four states.

What do they have in common?  In 2018, George employed DRE statewide with no paper backup.  The same was true for some jurisdictions in the remaining three states.  This did not go unnoticed.  In 2019, the Pennsylvania legislature mandated all newly purchased voting machines must have audit-able paper or image backup.  However, jurisdictions are allowed to continue to use older machines without this safeguard.

Georgia has also replaced it paperless system with one that prints a hard copy that can be reviewed by the voter before the final scan by a tabulating machine.  The paper version is retained in the event of a recount or audit.  However, as we learned during the Georgia primary in June, the system ran into several problems ranging from poll worker training to insufficient electrical power at some polling locations to handle the increased power demand.

Mitt Romney Voting Machines Goldman Sachs Bain Capital & Clear ...Say what you will about the potential for fraud using mail-in ballots, it remains the only voting system in which there is a hard copy of every ballot cast.  And concerns about the integrity of mail-in ballots are dwarfed by suspicions paperless Diebold voting machines in Ohio accurately tabulated votes in the 2004 presidential election.  Equally alarming was the fact Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell was a major fund-raiser for George W. Bush and Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell owned shares of Diebold stock. In 2006, Barry Levinson wrote and directed Man of the Year in which a long-shot presidential hopeful (Robin Williams) is declared the winner due to a voting machine programming error.  [NOTE: Whether the manufacture and maintenance of voting machines should be the purview of a private company without some level of external oversight is a topic for another day.]

During Michael Cohen’s February 2019 testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, he knew his past actions on behalf of Trump made him a less than credible witness.  His solution?  He brought the “receipts,” including copies of hush-money checks to Stormy Daniels signed by Trump.  Mail-in ballots are another stack of receipts Donald Trump does not want you to see, which is an equally compelling reason for him to undermine the Postal Service’s ability to operate at maximum efficiency.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

DeJoy of Sacks

 

Have you ever wondered why Democrats never tag the opposition with childish or offensive nicknames like “sleepy, crooked or Pocahontas?” Probably because they realize name-calling is a poor substitute for actually governing.  But I have a new theory.   Some of the most deserving members of Trump administration do not need new nicknames.  Their family names are far better descriptors than any epithets Democrats could come up with.

Consider the three member of DeBrotherhood of the Trumpist regime–Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis , and the most recent edition, Postmaster General Louis DeJoy.  According to Wikipedia, DeVos “is a concatenated form of the Dutch-language surname De Vos, meaning ‘the fox.'”  Can anyone argue there is no better example of the adage “the fox in the hen house” than DeVos in the Department of Education?

Next comes Governor DeSantis.  This surname is of Latin origin and comes from the word “sanctus” which means “holy” or “saintly.”  Of course, the prefix “De” is Latin for “from.”  And no one could be farther from holiness or saintliness than the chief executive of the Sunshine State.  Furthermore, is it mere coincidence the surname first appears in family records from the Lombardy region of Italy, the epicenter of the European coronavirus pandemic?  And now Governor DeSantis is responsible for his state’s holding the same distinction in America.  La ghianda non cade lontano dall’albero.

Louis DeJoy - WikipediaWhich brings us to the newest member of this trinity of incompetence, Mr. DeJoy.  Interestingly, none of the websites which provide information about the origins of surnames (e.g. NAMES.COM or ANCESTRY.COM) shed any light on the etymology of this one.  The only available data suggest the name is relatively new, first appearing around 1880.  And the preponderance of DeJoy families reside in Rhode Island.  The most alarming tidbit is the fact  there are 666 (I’m not making this up) census records with the last name DeJoy.  (Source: ANCESTRY.COM)

[NOTE:  There are no references to DeJoy’s middle name. Is he trying to hide something?  My money is on Damien.]

Since being confirmed as postmaster general in May 2020, DeJoy has brought anything but joy to the postal service under the guise of “timely legislative and regulatory reform.” So far, that reform consists largely of cuts in funding for essential services and a reorganization which has stripped upper management of most of its professional expertise.  These firings have certainly earned him the title, “DeJoy of Sacks.” Of course, timely means before the November election after which there hopefully will be no DeJoy in Mailville.

One can only imagine how Trump would expand this team DeHell if re-elected. I have no doubt, he would establish the position of assistant undersecretary of animal husbandry in the Department of Agriculture, and his pick to fill the position would be queen of the puppy farms Cruella DeVille.  And the epic cinema chronicle of the Trump years, “Girth of a Nation” would most likely be produced and directed by the ghost of Cecil B. DeMille.

As for America and democracy as we know it.  In the immortal words of Porky DePig, “De-De-De-De-Dat would be all, Folks!”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

Myth v. Reality

 

NOTE:  The following is my response to a op-ed piece in our local paper in which the writer questions how the son of a immigrant could possibly be anti-immigration.  To make his point, the writer provided a history of Mary Anne MacLeod’s immigration from Scotland to America and her early life here.  For the record, MacLeod would later marry Fred Trump and give birth to Donald Trump.

Mary Anne MacLeod Trump - WikipediaI applaud Patrick Keogh for sharing the story of Donald Trump’s mother Mary Anne MacLeod’s immigration to and early life in America.  Mr. Keogh is correct to point out it is the story of the parents and grandparents of an overwhelming majority of Americans, including my own grandparents who came to this country from Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 20th century.

Unfortunately, Mr. Keogh falls into the trap of mixing the myth of Donald Trump his supporters want you to believe with the reality.  At the end of his essay, Mr. Keogh claims Trump only “wants folks to comply with our laws just like his Mom did.”  Except of course when those laws might apply to him and his family.  In the case of immigration:

  • In August 1996, Melania Knavs (Trump) came to America on a B1/B2 tourist visa. In violation of the law, she immediately began working as a paid model.
  • When this became known in October of the same year, Ms. Knavs applied for an H-1B visa. According to the Department of Homeland Security website, eligibility for an H-B1 visa requires the applicant have “theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and attainment of a bachelor’s or higher degree in the specific specialty.”  Despite claiming to have a degree in Architecture and Design from the University of Ljubjana in Slovenia, in 2016, it was revealed she dropped out after one year.  Providing false information on a visa application is a federal crime.
  • Melania Knavs applied for and received an EB-1 visa in 2001. Although this particular visa is often referred to as “the Einstein visa” because of its association with Nobel prize winners and renown scientists, it is occasionally awarded to actors and models who excel in their fields.  However, if Ms. Knavs again claimed to have received a college degree, she violated a federal law.
  • In 2005, Melania Knavs applied for U.S. citizenship. The first question on the N-400 forms asks the applicant to affirm that he or she has “been a lawful permanent resident of the United States for at least 5 years.”  If she checked the box after providing false information on two previous visa applications that would also constitute a violation of federal law if she then signed Part 16 of the form which certifies “under penalty of perjury” the information provided is “complete, true and correct.”
  • Part 8 of the N-400 requires the applicant provide information about schools attended including dates of attendance. If the application (which has never been made available for public review) does not accurately reflect having dropped out after one year, she would again be guilty of perjury under the Part 16 signed certification.

On August 9, 2016, once discrepancies in his wife’s immigration history were revealed, Trump announced Melania would hold a news conference “over the next couple of weeks” in order to counter reports she violated immigration laws when she came to the U.S.  We’re still waiting.

The double standard does not end there.  Trump has called for an end of what he calls “chain migration,” by which adult American citizens obtain residency for their relatives.  In November 2017, Trump tweeted, “CHAIN MIGRATION must end now! Some people come in, and they bring their whole family with them, who can be truly evil. NOT ACCEPTABLE!”  On August 9, 2018, Donald Trump’s in-laws Viktor and Amalija Knavs became U.S. citizens in a private ceremony in Manhattan under that same family-based immigration program Trump repeatedly demands must end.

If Donald Trump wants to present himself as the “law and order president,” I suggest he replace the portrait of Andrew Jackson in the Oval Office with a needlework sampler which reads, “Compliance with the law begins at home.”

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP

 

God’s Plan

 

Truth in Advertising ALERT:  As long time readers know, I remain a devout agnostic.  The following is therefore offered as satire, not a representation of my personal beliefs.

For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.

~Jeremiah 29:11

From the beginnings of biblical history to modern day, religious leaders of all faiths have used the words in Jeremiah 29:11 to push back against those who dare question why a just and compassionate God would create a world in which there is so much death and destruction from war, disease and hate.  We are told to look at the big picture.  Or without knowing pain, how can we fully appreciate the blessings that same God lays before us everyday.

Stories of moral cleansing from a great flood or plagues were understandable when civilization was more superstitious than knowledgeable.  Sadly, in some circles, not much has changed in the five or six intervening millennia. Remember the flap over Pastor Jeremiah Wright’s declaration that 9/11 was “America’s chickens coming home to roost,” a result of years of human rights violations.  Unfortunately, Pastor Wright did not have a monopoly on such rubbish.  The late Jerry Falwell claimed the 9/11 attacks were divine retribution for abortion, gay and lesbian lifestyles and organizations like the ACLU and People for the American Way which were out to destroy our nation.

As suggested above, sometimes God’s wrath comes in the form of foreign invaders.  Sometimes he simply partners with Mother Nature.  Just ask televangelists John Hagee or Pat Robertson.   During an interview with NPR’s Terry Gross, Hagee provided the following cause of Hurricane Katrina.

The newspaper carried the story in our local area that was not carried nationally that there was to be a homosexual parade there on the Monday that the Katrina came. And the promise of that parade was that it was going to reach a level of sexuality never demonstrated before in any of the other Gay Pride parades. So I believe…that the Hurricane Katrina was, in fact, the judgment of God against the city of New Orleans

Robertson attributed the devastating earthquake in Haiti to the Haitians’ “pact with the devil.”  And what was the genesis of this unholy alliance?  According to Robertson, it was their desire for independence from France.  In his words, “You know, the Haitians revolted and got themselves free. But ever since, they have been cursed by one thing after the other.”  As comedian David Steinberg once said of his own father’s revulsion when it seemed to snow every December 25th, fulfilling Christians’ longing for a cliched White Christmas, “You have to admire prejudice like that.”  [NOTE:  Steinberg was born and raised in Winnipeg, Canada which would make a late December snowstorm the rule rather than the exception.]

The one thing missing from these modern day tales of divine intervention is any recognition of God’s grace.  After the great flood, there was a promise of a new, better world symbolized by the rainbow over Mt. Ararat.  The plagues in Egypt resulted in an end to the Israelites enslavement and return to their ancestral home, “a land of milk and honey.”

Which brings me to 2020 and the failure of faux Christians to notice that we are in the midst of an obvious example of how they profess God works in mysterious ways.  And who better to tell this story than the late Flip Wilson’s alter ego  Reverend Leroy of the Church of What’s Happening Now.

Can I hear an amen?

Brothers and sisters, in the words of Brother Bob Dylan, these are hard times.  Many of you have lost friends and families to the coronavirus.  Many of you are unemployed.  And in these moments of sorry and need, you ask, “Why is God punishing me?  What did I do to deserve this?  Is this part of His divine plan?”

Brothers and Sisters, ask no more. For those who think the Lord has forsaken us, fear not.  He continues to reveal himself as he always has.  From the beginning of time, God has always given us the chance, as Brother Spike Lee said, to do the right thing.  Only when we forsake his principles and the teachings of his son Jesus Christ does he step forward.

Remember Abraham’s sacrifice of his son Isaac.  Abraham thought it was a test of loyalty.  If so, God would have let the sacrifice go forward.  Instead, it was a test of free will, that Abraham need not obey an order, even one from the Almighty himself, when it was unjust.  Only when Abraham failed that test did God appear in the form of two angels and told Abraham to back off, Jack.*  Can you give me another amen?

If Pharaoh heeded Moses’ plea to “let my people go” after any of the first nine plagues, the first born Egyptian males would not have died.  God always gives us the opportunity to do the right thing.  He intervenes when we ignore that moment in time.

So if you ask, “Reverend Leroy, when did God give us a chance to avoid the coronavirus,” you need to first understand why it was necessary?  What possible good has it accomplished?  The answer, as they say in Motown, is in the timing.

God patiently watched as Americans elected a reality show con artist president of the United States.  He did not intervene when Donald Trump openly denigrated large segments of God’s children–Latinos, Muslims and gays.  He cried but did not act when Trump ordered babies separated from their mothers and put in cages.  He waited for the cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment.  He looked on as Senate Republicans ignored all the evidence and failed to remove him from office.

Only when it appeared Americans might give Trump four more years to  further abuse his authority and power, did God decree, “Enough is enough!  I must expose this dude for who he is.”  And once again, God unleashed His wingman, the Angel of Death, not to punish the innocent, but to remind us we still have a choice.  We can be self-centered and protect our own interests or we can follow the Lord and take the weak and needy into our hearts.

Can I get an amen?  Amen.

The proof of the pudding will come in November.  Though I doubt the possibility, imagine Trump loses in a landslide on election day and the coronavirus magically disappears without a vaccine or further mediation.  Now that would be a miracle of biblical proportions that would convert the most skeptical into believers.  A story that would no doubt be chronicled in “The Gospel According to Leroy,” a chapter of The Latest Testament.

And just for the record, as Reverend Leroy would say, “The devil made me write this post.”

*I first heard this interpretation of the story of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac from Rabbi Amy Perlin, the first female rabbi to found her own congregation.

For what it’s worth.
Dr. ESP